Oooo, really throwing me for a loop here. Yesterday I am talking dikon radish and today I have to define possibly the world’s most illusive construct? Alright, blog meme, I’ll see what I can do (do you like how I have to throw my two cents in about each day’s subject before I answer the question?)
The Greeks, whom you know I admire deeply, had four different definitions for what we currently refer to as “love”:
- Agape love is unconditional love. It is love by “choice” even if you are not pleased. A good example is “God loves us with our faults.”
- Philia love is the dispassionate virtuous love, guided by our likes or our healthy or unhealthy needs and desires.
- Storge is the word for family love and the physical show of “affection”, the need for physical touch. Sometimes the love between exceptional friends.
- Eros is the physical “sexual” desire, intercourse. It is the root word of erotic, and eroticism.
Those Greeks were pretty smart, weren’t they? I guess this is the sort of “definition” that I aspire to. Breaking down the different types of love makes it easier to rectify that the one word cannot truly be defined by one, singular meaning. In fact, there are many more loves that the Greek definitions don’t mention (like the protective, sometimes ridiculously fierce love a person feels for their dog).
So, I’m not Greek. And even though I admire and appreciate their help and their useful definitions, I am not Greek and this is not their blog. So I suppose, I have to come up with a definition of my own.
I’ve loved a lot of people in my life, a lot of things too, and one thing I am sure about, is that love is one of the only things that you continue to do, even when it hurts. If you smashed your foot in the door, or sliced your hand on a mandolin, you would feel pain, and you would go out of your way to avoid ever doing that again. Not so, with love. Despite the HUGE chance that it will be continuously painful, people pine and strive and go through unspeakable torment in the sake of love. What’s more, when love ends for one reason or another, the pain is even more intense, but that makes a person even more likely to look for new love faster and more desperately. On a similar but different note, love also defys pain in a more literal sense when given the fact that many people would put themselves in physical danger to save a loved one. All the various and complicated ways you can define the deep, spiritual, ethereal qualities of love are beautiful, but to me it all comes down to the basic fact.
Some might say that they can give examples of other times a person my put themselves in harms way, not for love- money, for example, might be their claim. I argue that the desire to acquire money is only a person’s manifestation of their desire to gain love. A person wants money so they can buy good and fancy things so they can enjoy life and attract the attention of people and earn their love OR they want money in order to help other people and in doing so gain their love.
So, what it boils down to in the end is that my definition is this: Love is the only thing that is stronger than a person’s instinct to avoid pain/ruin.






